Starfleet Commander Forum

Starfleet Commander => Original Universe => Topic started by: Rogan on September 11, 2013, 01:05:58 AM

Title: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Rogan on September 11, 2013, 01:05:58 AM
The Dark Sphere calls out to the darkness looking for those who would see red.

Who among the top 100 Alliances are willing to seek and be sought?

Those of you who blindlessly feed on the mind numbing minutia of NPC Farming, Inactive bashing, and randomn local active hits need not reply. We do not seek such weak minded, unskilled conflict with alliances of that caliber. You can simply decline our request. We will know who you are in the darkness and consider you secondary targets of opportunity, as training sessions on our way to hit real targets.

Who of you can avoid the eyeless stare from out of the darkness.

****************************************************************

A War is what we seek with all of you ... against the Darkness.

We seek to disturb the ether.

Same as the last Great Expansion of Red.

1 million victory points, no inactives, no diplomacy percentage.

First alliance to get pure pillage and DSP victory points on each other.

*****************************************************************

It's an all or nothing deal, Nuclear feasting and Planet scouring are acceptable, even though they gain no direct victory points. They do enable easy pillaging, if you leave your resources lay for too long or fail to provide for transport.

Planet moving, MACing, and Heph Raids are to be expected. All tactics employable .... within the rules of the conflict.

P mode is acceptable although it increases the length of the war. The more targets in diplomacy mode likewise increases the time of any conflict, limiting available active targets.

We hold no time limit to any conflict regardless of how long it takes for the victory counter to increase. Someone will ALWAYS be active in the darkness. We will continue until the victory counter is filled or one our alliances is disbanded, which ever comes first.

In the last Great Expansion, 9 accepted from the top 100, some of them multiple times. It generated over 3000 simultaneous red targets in the darkness to light our way ... to focus our time. Time to Play with you ... exclusively

*****************************************************************

So ... Who wants ...

A little hide and seek with eyes wide open in the darkness of the all consuming hunt.

A Hunt with the 'One hit Wonder' or the slow methodical attrition of 'The War of a Thousand Slashes'.

Which of you have the patience to hunt red actives,
to find when the watcher is not watching,
to play with the mind of the mindless,
to know the Redness in the Dark ...

We are the Dark Sphere. We are the War Alliance of Darkness.

The darkness is all around and we ... are at its center.

Who are you?

****************************************************************

Engage us or cower on bent knee to the darkness that is controlling you, forcing you to decide!
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 11, 2013, 02:14:02 AM
The first 10 request have been sent.  Will be sending them as I have time to the other 90. 

1    Time Wasters   Time    20,291,291,825
2    Squeaky Tree Frogs   Turtle B    10,233,733,410
3    Anarchist Killer Chihuahuas of Atlantis   KFC AA    8,502,885,963
4    7th Assault & Reconnaissance   ▌<╬> ▌    8,165,073,299
5    Disciples Of Muad'Dib   Based On    8,154,439,071
6    The Doom Beavers   beavers    7,939,600,226
7    Phoenix Risen   HOD    5,627,058,159
8    "Evil League of Evil"   Evil    5,584,121,500
9    NEOTERRAN   NTA    4,726,723,932
10    Glorious Order of Black Kabal   

All have a war request from The Dark Sphere.    We are setting a theme for all to have fun and we'd like to see you in red too.   If your in an alliance that denies our request to be apart of something completely Awesome but you'd still like to be, feel free to join us and put your skills to the real test.   Sea of Red!!

Galactic War 2 - The Darkness Lives
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 11, 2013, 10:50:14 PM
All 100 alliances have now been sent War request and emails.

11    Dominatus Class Unimatrix Zero    UniMat0    3,907,040,327
12    Dominatus Class League of Liquid Fire    ~ONYX~    3,691,871,012
13    Dominatus Class License To Kill    L2K    3,421,883,001
14    Dominatus Class No One Is Safe Ever    NOISE    3,377,457,904
15    Dominatus Class Hands Of Justice    JUSTICE    3,066,614,733
16    Dominatus Class The Andorian Black Fleet    ABF    2,713,748,378
17    Ruler Class ΡίιģŕΞщş ŎÉ Ŧħę ΒĻΔ«Κ äŲŊ    PILGRIMS    2,525,866,536
18    Ruler Class The Corporation    Profit    2,503,579,912
19    Ruler Class based on attackers    boa    1,920,043,640
20    Ruler Class A New Hope    New Hope    1,873,327,571
21    Ruler Class Lords Of War    Hostile    1,851,102,039
22    Ruler Class Sto-Vo-Kor    [SVK]    1,548,957,946
23    Ruler Class True Klingon    Bat'leth    1,548,860,615
24    Ruler Class The Dark Sphere    Ω 4K    1,399,567,670
25    Ruler Class Blades of the Ronin    RONIN    1,312,257,199
26    Ruler Class Jedi Council    JediCoun    1,281,054,396
27    Animus Class The Rebel Alliance    TRA    1,151,452,469
28    Animus Class Rigellian Compact    RgC    1,117,223,042
29    Animus Class <the Force>    <FORCE>    1,087,426,606
30    Animus Class Lone Wolves    ALPHAS    958,383,586
31    Animus Class United Federation of Planets    UFP    935,605,315
32    Animus Class Spacing Guild    Spice    921,628,741
33    Animus Class Liberty from the Dark side    Autonomy    866,532,675
34    Animus Class Grey Wolves    GreyWolf    847,458,240
35    Animus Class Crazy Soldiers with Talons    P@CT    798,563,289
36    Animus Class SWaRM    [SWaRM]    728,250,124
37    Animus Class "Rage-Quit"    RAGE    710,640,410
38    Animus Class Minutemen    time    677,704,552
39    Animus Class The Praetorian Guard    Praetor    665,225,472
40    Animus Class –arkNovaTau'ri    –kTau'ri    640,655,233
41    Master Class The Star Warriors    -TSW-    628,480,379
42    Master Class The Children of Kobal    CoK    544,760,152
43    Master Class Federation of Planets    Feds    526,570,494
44    Master Class A Galaxy Far Far Away    StarWars    522,064,025
45    Master Class Legions Of The Void    Corporat    502,871,425
46    Master Class Holy Roman Empire    HRE    476,235,334
47    Master Class Systemic Genesis    S-Gen    440,806,501
48    Master Class Defensive Pact    DefCon1    439,974,181
49    Master Class Federation of free worlds    F O F W    437,607,380
50    Master Class SWEDEN    SWE    382,389,283
51    Master Class Federation of Allied Planets    FAP    382,355,776
52    Master Class Spartan Alliance    SPARTANS    377,695,906
53    Master Class Astra Corps    USUK    369,080,152
54    Annihilator Class Sons Of Dune    Dune    342,488,417
55    Annihilator Class True Pug Empire    Pug    299,992,632
56    Annihilator Class Terrible One's    T1    290,428,173
57    Annihilator Class ☠ REAPERS ☠    REAPERS    277,888,080
58    Annihilator Class Jaynestown    *Firefly    271,816,819
59    Annihilator Class The platypus, according to Darwin, is evidence that God has a sense of humour.    [Nexus]    269,023,020
60    Annihilator Class Circle of Shadows    Circle    251,584,602
61    Annihilator Class The Dominion    Dominion    209,983,188
62    Annihilator Class Valente do Moita    Valente    197,345,157
63    Annihilator Class SFC Terror Alliance of Brothers and Sisters    STABS    170,904,058
64    Annihilator Class S.P.Q.R.S.    S.P.Q.R.    170,163,927
65    Annihilator Class 4 SALE    4 SALE    142,723,215
66    Annihilator Class Starfire Dragoons    SFD    142,548,451
67    Annihilator Class The Arcan Imperium    Arcan Im    120,437,208
68    Annihilator Class New Special Air Service    NSAS    107,508,529
69    Annihilator Class Commonwealth of Independant Planets    COIP    101,347,997
70    Annihilator Class Schmalkaldischer Bund    SchmBund    92,662,533
71    Terminus Class The Twelve Colonies of Kobol    KOBOL    86,064,539
72    Terminus Class Dark Angel    DA    82,064,800
73    Terminus Class Cry Havoc...    Havok    76,387,957
74    Terminus Class Bovine Scatology    Moo    74,708,492
75    Terminus Class Freelancers    FREE    72,257,591
76    Terminus Class Blueshift    blu    71,789,061
77    Terminus Class Galaxy of Dreams    Dreams    69,619,453
78    Terminus Class Legio XIII    Legio 13    68,831,233
79    Terminus Class Federated Universe    FU    66,880,708
80    Terminus Class The Regiment    Regis    66,024,635
81    Terminus Class Ancient Warrior Empire    AWE    56,470,979
82    Terminus Class USF    ..l.    55,702,289
83    Terminus Class Mammy Nuns    NUNS    55,486,044
84    Terminus Class Phoenix    Phoenix    55,049,931
85    Terminus Class Free Fremen    FF    54,590,976
86    Terminus Class I am gonna steal your debris cloud    Pirates    51,734,555
87    Omega Class Vulcan High Command    Vulcan    48,868,546
88    Omega Class Crazy Canadian Soldiers Retirement Villa    cCs    46,097,480
89    Omega Class Interstellar Union    I.U.    45,459,257
90    Omega Class HORIZON    HRZ    40,781,114
91    Omega Class NASA    NASA    39,996,115
92    Omega Class Tails of an Ox    OxTails    39,115,050
93    Omega Class The Ori    Origin    37,500,315
94    Omega Class Dust Bunny Empire    DBE    35,677,370
95    Omega Class Starship Troopers - Zeta    SST-Z    34,358,465
96    Omega Class The Republic of the Phoenix    R.O.P.    33,693,528
97    Omega Class We Are God    WAG    32,280,941
98    Omega Class United Colonies    UC    32,204,651
99    Omega Class Lang Mui Model    LanMo    31,385,911
100    Omega Class United Nations Space Command    UNSC    31,080,185


If you'd like to get in on this and we missed you by mistake or you weren't in the top 100 then let us know.  Feel free to msg me with any questions or comments.  Or if your in one of these alliances with a 0, 0, 0 war record that take offense to being sent a war request but they are to chicken to do anything about it, and you'd like to still be apart of it.   Come Join us!   We are doing nothing but having fun.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 11, 2013, 11:33:34 PM
I really grow weary of you calling everyone who doesnt participate in your style of play, a chicken. I must get around to doing something about that, and no formal declaration of war will be required.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 12, 2013, 12:04:26 AM
Oh Snap!!!! Lite his ass up laz!!! ;D
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Rogan on September 12, 2013, 01:01:21 AM
I really grow weary of you calling everyone who doesnt participate in your style of play, a chicken. I must get around to doing something about that, and no formal declaration of war will be required.

None required. You will be training material instead.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 12, 2013, 01:37:41 AM
Well I looked around at your alliance. One 2 digit store bought account that is being run into the ground, a few accounts in the 200-400 range, and the rest are noobs apparently. I would feel like a school yard bully attacking any of you. Now if you would like to choose 5 of your best players (no ringers) and a battleground, I will meet you there. No peeing no dipmo. If you refuse, you will show yourselves to be the cowards you really are.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 12, 2013, 01:53:46 AM
BTW, i could have said 50 of your best players and still whup your ass with one hand tied behind my back.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Commander imad on September 12, 2013, 02:06:50 AM
Wow ! Never seen laz pissed . This can't be good for the darkness .
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Mightypotter1 on September 12, 2013, 08:34:28 AM
As Leader of KFC AA I would like to ask why you issue so many war requests in one hit?
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: von Imhof on September 12, 2013, 10:42:42 AM
Wow ! Never seen laz pissed . This can't be good for the darkness .

This might be good...lol.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 12, 2013, 11:31:50 AM
I'll deal with this one a little later today. I've been rather busy trying to creat fun for most of you.

Laz I'm glade you brought that up, if your one of the ones with a O O O war record who claim to fight a war game yet don't have single war under your belt and you responded in hast to my war request then that statement was made specifically for you and those of you who are the same as  Laz. 


@ laz I've already told you, there isn't a thing you could do to me except ravage what little d I have and nothing more.  You know we're my planets are.  Your big enough, come try or cower with the rest of them.  Your right the darkness doesn't need a war request to attack or be attacked. It is just the guide of red we seek that keeps us on tract to our next target.  Not to mention the fun it is to finish that war hit.  Just ask meeee who ended there's in less then a day with honor and pride.  Something you apparently don't have.   Put that in your pipe and smoke it big boy


Oh btw I'm pretty sure I did just put my best 5 on the line, in fact I put my best and worst 43 on the line and you denied the request and cowered to hunt npc instead and inflate your account some more
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 12, 2013, 11:48:56 AM
As Leader of KFC AA I would like to ask why you issue so many war requests in one hit?


We seek a sea of red and fun for all come join us in this quest for fun and activity, the thrill of the hunt and to be hunted. 
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 12, 2013, 03:14:31 PM
His top 5 couldn't scratch your fleet laz..if you left it parked over nite..lol.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 12, 2013, 04:03:44 PM
who's cowering?:
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 12, 2013, 04:06:10 PM
Never said I could gypsy.   That's not the point here


Again you are Laz with your 0, 0 , 0 record and the fact that your upset I called you on it and your still not doing anything but mouthing. 
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 12, 2013, 04:13:14 PM
I haven't seen that many kitty's since I was in the pet store... Lol  ;D
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: ISS Hawk on September 12, 2013, 04:21:12 PM
Wait a minute......you guys (Lazoputz and Kaork) are buddies in the game and fighting here?
LoL thats a new one.  ::)
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 12, 2013, 04:27:15 PM
I can tell you with certainty that we are NOT buddies. If Kaork would man up and stop peeing so much, there would be no Kaork. It is true that he shows on my buddy list, but that is merely because he bought an account from someone who not only was a buddy, but was a real player.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 12, 2013, 05:55:17 PM
For the record I was givin  this account from a good friend whom I originally gave the account to him.  It's actually one of my original accounts.  Further more I have never bought an account.   Furthermore if you think you can get my fleet, bring it cause I ain't scared :P.   I'd rather you do it under a war request but you do it anyway that floats your boat.    I'm a man standing taunting you.  Your a man cowering behind your words and fleet that won't even fight a war in a war game.  I've already won.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 12, 2013, 06:53:29 PM
Lol, stay out of the bathroom (pee-mode) and I would take you up on it. But since you cower behind the toilet all the time, you are not worthy of real players wasting their time or breath on.
The only thing you have "won" is to make yourself look ridiculous publicly.

My offer stands to match up against your 5 best (willing) players in a battle, not a silly game of cat and mouse. You move 5 planets to one location (1 from each of your best players), I will move one of mine to the same location. Then we duke it out, last man standing wins. If you beat me, i will forward the credit cost for the move to each of your players. Turn this offer down and we will really know who is the coward.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 12, 2013, 07:21:21 PM
Balls in your court kaork????
I only hear clucking!!!  :o
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 12, 2013, 09:59:40 PM
'Cluck cluck' Really? I send out 100 war request and tell Laz to kiss my ass and I'm the chicken.  Lmao boy you must love that little world you live in, in that head of yours.


Laz I have a Galactic war going that I've invited you to, I'm willing to take you on anyway you want to take me on war or no war.   I've told you and your alliance that you have no Balls to fight and all you have more then proven that.  I didnt call you out publicly until you called yourself out.  Ive dared you to come try something and yet out of all that all you can do is come up with an impossible situation that you no I can't do and then say I'm the chicken.  That's like saying your a dumb ass unless you go jump off a bridge.   Pretty friggin retarded if you ask me.   You started this, I just stood up.   Go catch another npc cause there is nothing you will do to my top 5; my top 10 or anyone in the alliance and if you do it won't be me.  You can give 100 excuses why you gots no Balls but the fact remains, you got no Balls.   Balls are in my court cause they are attached and believe me when I say they hang real low.  Sometimes I step on them when I walk. 

Kaork
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 12, 2013, 10:16:14 PM
Actually, the start of this was when you said anyone who didnt play this game the way YOU wanted, was a chicken. I am merely suggesting that you are the chicken because you wont play the way I want. Man to man.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 12, 2013, 10:21:56 PM
Since the last war when you run your mouth..there's a few of around me....I play almost 18 he's a day.. Your alliance lives in p mode...and boy??? I'm old enough to be your daddy...wait what was your mother's name...there was this one night at the bar...hell I might just be your daddy....to bad I left the best part of you on the sheets.....so come out of p mode...here kitty kitty  :D
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 12, 2013, 10:39:45 PM
Since the last war when you run your mouth..there's a few of around me....I play almost 18 he's a day.. Your alliance lives in p mode...and boy??? I'm old enough to be your daddy...wait what was your mother's name...there was this one night at the bar...hell I might just be your daddy....to bad I left the best part of you on the sheets.....so come out of p mode...here kitty kitty  :D


Trust me, you ain't my daddy.  I'm not made out of a pile of chicken crap.   Why don't you tell everyone which alliance your in.

Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 12, 2013, 10:48:45 PM
Actually, the start of this was when you said anyone who didnt play this game the way YOU wanted, was a chicken. I am merely suggesting that you are the chicken because you wont play the way I want. Man to man.


Hey Laz if your gonna quote something use it in context.  Wait in this case use any word in the quote, oh wait you did, 'chicken'.  Let me go find the quote for you so we can go over this.


'All have a war request from The Dark Sphere.    We are setting a theme for all to have fun and we'd like to see you in red too.   If your in an alliance that denies our request to be apart of something completely Awesome but you'd still like to be, feel free to join us and put your skills to the real test.   Sea of Red!! '.

Oh wait that's not the quote.  That's the idea!   Not this crap you keep spewing talking about how angry it makes you feel, this is the way I play.  But go ahead feel angry, the darkness brews inside you.   
This is the way I play, like it or not.  It wasn't my choice for you to take us off topic.
 
One sec let me get the real quote:


'If you'd like to get in on this and we missed you by mistake or you weren't in the top 100 then let us know.  Feel free to msg me with any questions or comments.  Or if your in one of these alliances with a 0, 0, 0 war record that take offense to being sent a war request but they are to chicken to do anything about it, and you'd like to still be apart of it.   Come Join us!   We are doing nothing but having fun.'


You decided to take it upon yourself to think and let everyone know you think I was talking about you and Sputed off.   Not realizing that I may of received many msg from many alliances and all different from respectful to full out cruelty with cursing and name calling.   I have received some 3 pages of msg since Rogan posted this board.  But hey buddy if the shoe fits and in this case you picked the shoe up, tried it on, tested it and out walked out the door.   That is not my faught, you knew when you posted what you were doing cause you know, I don't stop.   That is the darkness as it is unstoppable. The only chance you have is to to fight it in war.   Otherwise you are either over come by it or bow out respectfully.  The Dark Sphere is THE WAR ALLIANCE  and there is no other that gets even close.


Kaork
The Darkness Lives
into the Darkness
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Unownreality on September 12, 2013, 11:19:30 PM
You dont need to be in a war to kill someone's fleet. Simple as that.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 12, 2013, 11:42:28 PM
cant kill a fleet parked when online and pee mode when off. That is the problem. I asked kaork to come out and back up his mealy-mouthed words with action. Obviously he has refused, even when I offered to let him bring a gang with him.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 12, 2013, 11:43:20 PM
Be in one, then tell me that its the same thing.  If you have you can not.    Then if you have been in one try being in many, and feel the real fun of this game!   U are all missing out and missing the point
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 12, 2013, 11:45:42 PM
cant kill a fleet parked when online and pee mode when off. That is the problem. I asked kaork to come out and back up his mealy-mouthed words with action. Obviously he has refused, even when I offered to let him bring a gang with him.


You know where I'm at.  You already said you had the credits to move planets, feel free to stack up.  You can't call out someone that called you out first and think you have a leg to stand on.  As I said missing the point. Go back to your pathetic daily grind and burn out like the rest of them. We are busy having fun, if you want to let me know.   
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 12, 2013, 11:53:43 PM
Sry, not my style. Now if you could A: tell me of any "war" where you could call "time-out" (pee-mode) or B: start a war with me with NO pee-mode and only dipmo by the opposing sides approval, then I would gladly leave my alliance and take your whole gang on single-handedly.
Who gives you the ability to determine what is fun for me? Certainly the majority of the players in this game disagree with you, judging by the number of negative responses you are getting. Here's an idea, start up your own game where everyone hides from each other and see how many people join up.

On more thing (minor); if you could just read over your posts before hitting the "post" button and try to correct some of the more hard to understand statements, I would appreciate it. I am not good at deciphering "stupid speak"
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 13, 2013, 12:02:35 AM
If you can't understand: 'You are a coward, do something or don't!'   Then something is wrong with you and you might want to get your eyes or brain checked. 


Facts:

 your war record 0,0,0


This is a forum about War, you are obviously 100% anti-war who claims to play a war game.  I'm not an idiot, I know how fleets get that big, it ain't by hunting thy enemy or a live one at least.   So why are you even here?

If you've noticed I've been saving your p mode talk.   It would seem your against most of what the game has to offer.  Oh wait, I know I've seen you in p before.  But that's ok, you'll claim it's ok for you, after all, your the almighty Laz.   The same Laz that was talked down to by Kaork and You and your alliance and you never did a thing but spout nonsense.


Need me to spell it out for you?   

Keep digging that hole, I love to bury those that think they are better then others but don't back it to prove it. 

Oh one more thing, minor.   We have already had 3 accept and many more thinking about it with many thanks for thinking of ways to make this game fun for them.  It is you that has gotten lost in the past of thinking like the ways of the old.   That's darkness speak for: the new way has come.  Join in or move over bacon.

Ps you have another war request from us.  Fight or bow
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 13, 2013, 12:16:36 AM
You are right I was in pee mode once. For 6 weeks while I was in the hospital getting reconstructed from an accident, which by the way, has left me wheelchair bound so I have plenty of time to play.
And once again (and for the final time) just because you have a style of "play" does not in any way make it the ONLY way this game can be fun. Except maybe for the feeble-minded who cant fight a real war. Meet me on the battlefield or shut the hell up. We dont need a declaration or war that removes all threat of defeat, and again I refer to "pee-mode". Remove that from your list of cowardly rules and I will be all over you and your gang like white on rice.
Let me tell you also, I was a high ranked player long before the advent of NPCs. So how would you like to explain that? I wish a few people would step up here and tell you just what running into me meant, but I fear that most of them have either rage quit or left the game because the ranks of players is filling up with morons.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Unownreality on September 13, 2013, 12:37:21 AM
You turned this whole forum into your pointless wars. i'd take a guess and say at least 75% of the SFCO posts are your posts. You bash others for playing differently, calling them cowards and such and you hide in p mode. I don't blame anyone for declining your pointless war requests. At last check you had a 68% Diplomacy ratio. Countless more like yourself, or neutrality w*****. Keep talking your stuff kaork, nobody is taking you or your alliance seriously anymore. Wake up and smell the roses.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 13, 2013, 01:50:03 AM
As I quote a good friend of mine:

My opinion is still > then your opinion. 

Our war record is many and we are all having fun.  Many joined the last one and I expect many more to see past the ways of your arrogant once was's.  You all started this, not me, you all took this off topic attempting to gang bang me.  Not without a reach around I say!   Your old ways of thinking are history and you will fizzle out realizing your doing nothing more then farmvilling and to have never of spent that energy to even try to do something with all those skills and fleet you created.  How pathetically sad.   

" Remove that from your list of cowardly rules and I will be all over you and your gang like white on rice."

I believe thats nothing more then another pathetic excuse, While on one had you claim to be 100% against war in another you claim you'd be on me like white on rice. Not only a comment that completely contradicts what you say you stand for but also a raciest comment.   Which is it bud, you'll fight me but not unless there is all these specially rules.  You have the #1 fleet rank in the Uni for Christ sake, can you say meow?


As stated, I made a general statement to a select person, however if you want to wear his shoes go ahead.   I made this about fun and activity and put my alliances fleets on the line to provide that fun and activity.  You 3 are the ones that made this negative drivel with trash talking and name calling.   You 3 are the ones that no one should be listening to and if they are I really hope they rethink there ways of going with the people that are against activity and fun.   

And I believe everyone is reading this so called drivel weather they agree with you or the real warriors of the game.


The Darkness Lives and its coming to a theater near you, weather you like it or not
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 13, 2013, 02:14:46 AM
First post in this forum, by Rogan, and simply a call to war
Second post in this Forum, by Kaork and merely a re-iteration of the warcall
Third post in this forum, by Kaork, (and this is the root cause of the digression from war-mongering) includes this statement: Or if your in one of these alliances with a 0, 0, 0 war record that take offense to being sent a war request but they are to chicken to do anything about it,
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Vastet on September 13, 2013, 02:20:45 AM
I was quoted! :D

Can I play the good guy for once?

Nah forget it. Not my style. Flame on!
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Unownreality on September 13, 2013, 02:34:03 AM
Forgot about that rule that says we cant attack actives if we arent at war with each other. Damn, someone report me please! I killed too many actives while we weren't at war. Kaork logic says that i can only farm NPCs if we arent at war.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 13, 2013, 05:36:44 AM
Wow another day and kaork is still in kitty mode...how can I attack you coward when you hide????
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Vastet on September 13, 2013, 10:02:46 AM
So if he wasn't in p you'd sat bash him? Sounds like a valid reason to use p. > >

Though I maintain that p should not exist.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 13, 2013, 10:53:01 AM
No vastet...that's your play style I hear...but before someone shoots off at the mouth about war...maybe they should stay out of p mode....or learn how to properly FRS....
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: the red emperor on September 13, 2013, 12:45:58 PM
Bfg will never remove p mode because of the profit they make on it.  I bet the french told the germans im in p mode cant attack me until I had my breakfast and coffee. Maybe usa should have told the japanese that they couldnt bomb pearl harbor until we sign a war declaration and agree how many people could be in diplomacy mode.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: the red emperor on September 13, 2013, 12:48:44 PM
I enjoy the fact players are making pvp fun in this game again, but they are unintentionally ruining the fun by all the drama
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: ISS Hawk on September 13, 2013, 01:23:18 PM
I agree with red emperor.

If you dont wanna go to war, just decline politely. I'm sure Kaork wouldnt be nuts enough to instigate you then. IMO he's just trying to make the game fun by doing what the thinks is right / necessary. When someone declines he mocks and insults them only to make them mad and declare war  :D
I'd suggest ignoring the taunting. Please for GOD'S SAKE stop with the arguing already. I come here sometimes, only to see whats going on in the other parts of the game, and I mostly see people fighting with each other over petty issues.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 13, 2013, 01:46:34 PM
Well let me tell you, when I received their "war" request, I simply responded "decline". Following that there was a whole series of nasty pms from Kaork, that were far greater on the insult level that what he has posted here. I posted back to him continuously polite reasons why, but it wasnt good enough for him so he brought his taunts to this forum and made it public. If anyone chooses to disbelieve this, I can and will post the entire transcript of that conversation here upon request.
I will also say that I have received numerous support messages from other players but they will remain private since they were sent to me in game and I respect their privacy. It seems that The Dark Sphere should change mouth-pieces if they wish to "have fun" and remain harmonious here. I offer up the way another war is being treated and enjoyed by all as an example of how it should be: Based On/Justice.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: ISS Hawk on September 13, 2013, 01:55:40 PM
Yeah I believe you.

In the last galactic war, Rogan tried the same trick with us. He bad-mouthed us here on the forum but neither I nor anyone from my alliance responded and it died out before it even started.

Moral - Someone's gotta be mature.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Unownreality on September 13, 2013, 02:09:38 PM
Moral - Someone's gotta be mature.

well it sure as hell ain't gonna be me
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 13, 2013, 02:11:58 PM
Me either...I'm gonna act my shoe size!!! Not my age :o
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Vastet on September 13, 2013, 05:15:09 PM
No vastet...that's your play style I hear...but before someone shoots off at the mouth about war...maybe they should stay out of p mode....or learn how to properly FRS....

Then you listen to liars. :)
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 13, 2013, 11:55:20 PM
Sorry not everyone has time to sit in a chair and stair at a computer screen for a game all day and do nothing, some of us have to make a livin and raise kids :).  I play when and as often as i can.  But Vasat has a point.  I played this game for 3.5 years with never dropping d or using p markers with players and alliances like Vtc and Time nipping at my heals going to war with Time as a barely ranked 100 alliance.  Ive lost jobs and probably a marriage over this game.  I wont make that mistake again and nothing you can say to change my mind about that.  But i have devoted years of my life to this game and there is nothing you can say to take that away either.   I've always been this way guys its nothing new. 

But to be realistic Laz did send me a msg 'declined' and I responded with


To: lazoputz
Date: 2013-09-11 02:09:26 UTC
Sad it is you immidiatly decide for your team what there game play should be. This could be alot of fun for them even if you don't want to engage from your daily routeen. You should ask them and actually see if some of them want to put there skills to a real test.



He decided to continue to explain/escalate the conversation. I took that as 'give me a reason'.  So I did.   This was all in private and I had no intention of bring it to the forums.  Yeah I called those with 0,0,0 records chicken.  Again trying to give all of you another reason and mostly cause I personally think so.  Again the 3 of you decided to escalate the conversation.    Me, I do not and will not back  down so if you don't want to be a part of it or me give you a reason to be a part of it simple he respectful about it.   There were many alliances that were and they got pleasant msgs from me.  But if you act like or try to tell me your way is better then mine then I'm gonna tear you up.


Oh and I love the fact I have torn all of you up so badly that you have come to having nothing else to talk about me other then I am in P mode.   I get a kick out of it honestly.


I hope all have fun playing the game they chose to play, me i try to make fun for others.  And my hope is you'll come have fun with us

Kaork
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 14, 2013, 12:05:07 AM
Well, since Kaork decided to bring a small portion of our conversation to this forum, to be fair, I will post it in its entirety here:

A transcript of a conversation between myself and Kaork (The dark Sphere) following my decline to accept his war invite.

1:
To: lazoputz
Date: 2013-09-11 02:09:26 UTC
Sad it is you immidiatly decide for your team what there game play should be. This could be alot of fun for them even if you don't want to engage from your daily routeen. You should ask them and actually see if some of them want to put there skills to a real test.

1A:
To: Kaork
Date: 2013-09-11 02:11:21 UTC
We have discussed it in the past, and it was decided as a group that I would make any war arrangements

2:
To: lazoputz
Date: 2013-09-11 02:17:12 UTC
Know I consider your decision for your alliance sad and pathetic and your members who allow you to cower don't have balls big enough to war with us. :).

2A:
To: Kaork
Date: 2013-09-11 02:21:32 UTC
Declining your invite for war is only a sign of weakness to you. We just cant be bothered with such nonsense. I probably could wipe out your entire alliance single-handedly if I so choose.

3:
To: lazoputz
Date: 2013-09-11 02:27:54 UTC
So come try. Get a war winning hit for once. Wanna know sad. You 0 0 0 war record. You call yourself playing a war game and you don't even have one war under your belt.
L A M E ! ! !

I'd rather have 100 losses and no fleet then have a 0 0 0

Enjoy your NpC hunt and lazy game play of never leaving your moons to have true adrenalin rushes of fighting your nemeses. Just don't ask me to understand. 'Bothered with nonsense. '. Geez that sounded lame.

Let your boys know what I've said. Lets see if they have a different say then the mighty Lazoputz.

3A:
To: Kaork
Date: 2013-09-11 02:36:31 UTC
Just because we dont actively fight your style of "war" does not make us any less effective as a team.
I cannot tell you how many twerps such as yourself have made a mistake in this game such as wandering too far from their planets or heph, and paid the price. But I wont get into that, you seem to spend an inordinate amount of time in dipmo or peemode, so we dont consider you either a threat or a potential target.




This was also posted on my alliance forum as it happened but for privacy reasons and so as not to embarrass Kaork too much, their comments will remain private.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 14, 2013, 12:11:03 AM
Kaork said: "Sorry not everyone has time to sit in a chair and stair at a computer screen for a game all day and do nothing" and "some of us have to make a livin and raise kids"

And I am sorry for you as well, it is indeed a joy after working in the construction industry for 40 years to suddenly find oneself confined to a chair and unable to do the things he has been able to do all his life.
I spent those 40 years having a life and raising a family and know how terrible that is.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 14, 2013, 02:03:46 AM
Laz thanks for repeating everything I just said.  I just told everyone I escalated the conversation owning to the fact I did it and gave your the reason why.  Now everyone can see that you continued the conversation and are still continuing the conversation when you could simply bow out.  This is me, this is the Darkness.  I taunt you to force you into having fun or choosing not to.  But I do it in an escalation path that I give you plenty of chances to just how out.  Start nice and get louder and louder.  When your buddies join in and start trying to gang bang me well I can get down right nasty.  I mean lets be honest here, I keep giving you chances to bow out and you keep talking. 


And the chair comment pisses me off.  For you to take what I said and try to make that about you, trying to make everyone feel sorry for you.   I in no way meant that as a stab toward you and while I am sorry for your condition as any human with any conscious of humanity would be, I in no way would ever make fun of it.  On the other hand I also never said raising my kids is terrible and for you to  put words in my mouth to say I did is wrong and you can simply kiss my ass. 








Oh and btw you forgot the last msg I sent you, but then again you needed to try and make yourself look good and try to make me look as bad as possible by twisting my words and not including the full conversation.  I can see the game you like to play.   


To: lazoputz
Date: 2013-09-11 02:43:56 UTC
:). Thanks for saying you wouldn't waist your time on such an awesome player and alliance like myself/ourselves.

This has been fun but I guess we know where you stand. You say you work great as a team yet you've never tested that in war. You know nothing of the game or what war is. Until you do you have nothing to say about knowing a war game. Big bad fleet or not. Put it to use or don't tell me you play or can come take my fleet or won't try cause you know you can't with some lame excuses.

Edited as I posted the 2nd to last msg. This is the last msg

To: lazoputz
Date: 2013-09-11 04:17:57 UTC
Alright sounds good.

Now to put a nicer twist on things. I wrote this to someone else and felt it worthy of also sending to you. It's words are true and stright and really how I feel and what im trying to do and why I'm trying to do it. It's an honorable cause and the more people we have on board the better it will be for everyone and this game/uni. This idea has caught on in other Uni's and its something that will keep the game alive if we all pitch in and work together to play this chess game against each other. Won't you sit at my board?


You wanna know why it pisses you off that we do this. Cause it disturbes your little easy going world and what you think you have created. Continue to sit in the darkness and chose for the rest of your group promoting no extra fun of the 'real hunt' to a victory hit on a sea of red. Continue to watch the once great membership of this uni drop by the 100's every month.

Put a nice twist on it, this could be fun for your team and give you some relief from the Dailey grind that gets boring. To leave the safty of your moon and hunt your nemisis for the victory of a war winning hit. Until you do it you will simply never know and I rather find it sad at this time you don't. I'm trying to give you that chance. To put my fleet and my alliances fleets on the line for your enjoyment of the chase. You see you came at me with straight up anger but that's just the darkness inside you trying to get out. Do it in the game bro. At least once before you flutter out and we all watch this game die. I promiss it is nothing but fun especially if both sides keeps it clean and just plays the chess game.


He sorta came at me with a few choice name calling right off the bat. Lol. This is how I really want to approach this. This is about fun bud but we all gotta do our part and promote it. It's nothing different then a monthly tourney

Again another chance for you to gracefully bow out.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 14, 2013, 02:13:35 AM
You chair comment immediately followed my comment about why I have lots of time to play. Do you take me for a fool? Do you think the other people reading this forum cant see you for the low life you are? I have never seeked nor asked for sympathy from anyone in my life. The people in this game that know me can attest to that. What I am is what I am.
You say you give me a chance to bow out of this conversation, then spout pure nonsense. YOU BOW OUT. NOW!
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 14, 2013, 02:51:17 AM
You chair comment immediately followed my comment about why I have lots of time to play. Do you take me for a fool? Do you think the other people reading this forum cant see you for the low life you are? I have never seeked nor asked for sympathy from anyone in my life. The people in this game that know me can attest to that. What I am is what I am.
You say you give me a chance to bow out of this conversation, then spout pure nonsense. YOU BOW OUT. NOW!


' Do you take me for a fool?'   I didn't used to but I do now.


This is the 2nd time you've brought up that your disabled.   I ignored them both times.  I was commenting to the 50 times you mentioned I was a pussy for using pmode but hey it's ok for you to talk to people like that cause your the all mighty Laz and when someone shows you aren't so mighty you turned to feel sorry for me crap and trying to twist this to make it seem I'm making fun of your condition.  You simply mistake my character on the forums in trying to make some fun for folks as pure meanness and evil, but you are wrong. I am the kid that would kick the shit out of people for making fun of the less fortunate.  I have fought for people in your condition and I WILL not let you sit here and say I'd say otherwise.     And buddy, there is NO WAY I'm bowing out of this.   
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 14, 2013, 02:59:39 AM
Me neither, but i am laughing too hard right now to respond.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 14, 2013, 03:15:09 AM
Lol well good :).   I wouldn't ever make fun of your condition bud.  I'm being 100% sincere.


I will say I miss the day of being able to play all day and not spending money on the game so that I can continue playing.   Trust me I don't like that some of my very tight budget has to go to a game so i can continue playing it and still do RL.   But this is SFC aka Crack and I am addicted.   
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Pantin on September 14, 2013, 05:02:42 AM
So many empty threats and warnings.... so little actual battle reports... Someone wake me up when one of you two actually manage to hit the other. Otherwise...

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 14, 2013, 05:53:28 AM
Well thanks for stopping by to read over our wonderful little drama skit.   We did it specifically for your enjoyment so really appreciate the feedback we asked for.   

Brought to you by.....nabisco.   
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 14, 2013, 06:01:59 AM
Kaork if you got all this time to post and run your mouth...then you got time to come out of kitty mode....does anyone else hear clucking
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Pantin on September 14, 2013, 06:26:03 AM
I don't actually scour the thread sone by one, I check the "most recent post" options so I have to suffer through your pissing contest :p
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Admiral T-Wayne on September 14, 2013, 03:30:55 PM
This has very little (nothing??) to do with this thread, except it addresses something that Kaork said in one of his previous posts.

Kaork accused laz of making a racist statement for using the expression, "like white on rice".

Nope.  Think about it.  White.  Rice.  Rice is white. The white is really close to the rice.  The main use of the term is this:

   
To be on or close to something.

And, in his context, that is how laz meant to use the term.


Kaork, did you have another usage in mind?

Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 14, 2013, 05:02:59 PM
All ill say is come down to the southern US. Find a 'hood' stand out on the street and yell that and tell me how long you last.   

In other words you would offend anyone of color if you said that around them and since this is a public forum I'm pretty sure it did so didn't want to let it slide as being ok.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Admiral T-Wayne on September 14, 2013, 05:54:15 PM
Kaork,

I was raised in the southern U.S., I was raised with both blacks and whites, and I live in Texas today among blacks, Hispanics, and whites, and the only context I have ever understood for that expression is the one that I mentioned.  Heck, Tina and Ike Turner sung a song during which they used the term to describe the "tightness" of their relationship!

Maybe you understand that to be a racist term, but, knowing what I know about laz, including where he lives, I strongly suspect that he had never heard that term used in a racist context.

It's a shame that people will take a totally innocent expression and pervert it into having a non-innocent meaning that is offensive to some.  Yeah, I've looked up the term on the Internet, and I now understand the alternative meaning.  I just don't know how such a meaning could have become wide-spread.  The meaning I've described has been around a looooong time.  I'm guessing that the alternative has become common fairly recently, with the advent of the Internet. 

I think that you have to examine the full context of how "white on rice" is used to understand how it is intended.  "I'm on that like white on rice" -- clearly, the intention is to use the term as I have described -- "I'm on to it tight".  When the expression is used as a comparative --with "like" in the sentence -- I would always give the speaker/writer the benefit of the doubt and assume that the term is being used as I've described it.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 14, 2013, 06:14:28 PM
I understand the argument and your right about Laz prob didnt know.   It is my opinion though that if you know it offends in a raciest way you prob shouldn't use it. So basically I let him know so be would know, I didnt call him a racist but let him know the term was considered a raciest comment in at most of the US or at the very least where I'm from.   Btw Ike used that in the song he wrote for Tina to sing because of the 100 years of oppression of it being used by white men pushing there 'helpers' to work harder and if they did not then.... Well u get the picture.  So they created a new term for it during the Martin Luther king days to do their part in showing that freedom and oppression were over and that the white man couldn't use that term the way they did anymore cause they gave it a new meaning.  Ike and Tina actually didnt get along to well, I mean Ike beat Tina for years forcing her to sing against her will.  I doubt very seriously she had any real 'tightness' as you say other the. Ike's hands around Tina's throat maybe.  Read up on the history of it if you'd like. I think they also made a movie about it. 

Hope everyone's having a good day and finding some nice hits.  Though war hits are the best kind so if you'd like war and would like to be a part of something a little different the normal grind without having to switch Uni's come join in on the Galactic Wars against the Darkness that we all fall victim to. 

Kaork
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Admiral T-Wayne on September 14, 2013, 10:13:33 PM
Kaork,

Here's what I've read about "white on rice".  I've only found documentation regarding two meanings -- "being as close as the white is on rice" and a white-Asian couple.  I can't find anything that has anything to do with slavery and such.  Can you point me to a reference that discusses that connotation?

Where's one little paragraph on the subject:

The expression 'white on rice' is so old no one knows where it comes from. It's mainly used to say that someone or something sticks so close to you that they're like the white color on rice. Modern use has added some sexual connotation to the saying by using it for relations between Asian and Caucasians.

Here's another little tid-bit I found, which goes back to good old Ike Turner:

"...it seems that the phrase was popularized by Ike Turner in the Ike & Tina song Baby Get It On. Personally I'd say that since Ike Turner said the phrase, it's much more sexist the racist anyway."

Perhaps there are some other references you can point us to, that indicate this has been around for a couple of hundred years with a slave-related connotation.  Because, frankly, I can't find it.



Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 15, 2013, 12:26:46 AM
Wow...wow....wow...kaork for someone who doesn't coke out of kitty mode...no time to play the game...you sure find a lot of time to run your mouth....I'm a redneck from the deep south....lord  help us if you are....we ain't gonna claim you
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 15, 2013, 05:25:37 AM
Su
Kaork,

Here's what I've read about "white on rice".  I've only found documentation regarding two meanings -- "being as close as the white is on rice" and a white-Asian couple.  I can't find anything that has anything to do with slavery and such.  Can you point me to a reference that discusses that connotation?

Where's one little paragraph on the subject:

The expression 'white on rice' is so old no one knows where it comes from. It's mainly used to say that someone or something sticks so close to you that they're like the white color on rice. Modern use has added some sexual connotation to the saying by using it for relations between Asian and Caucasians.

Here's another little tid-bit I found, which goes back to good old Ike Turner:

"...it seems that the phrase was popularized by Ike Turner in the Ike & Tina song Baby Get It On. Personally I'd say that since Ike Turner said the phrase, it's much more sexist the racist anyway."

Perhaps there are some other references you can point us to, that indicate this has been around for a couple of hundred years with a slave-related connotation.  Because, frankly, I can't find it.





Sure. Here is an entire political debate on it and other 'non raciest comments' that some would still consider raciest

http://m.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/21/1163723/-Like-white-on-Rice-Republican-critics-say-there-s-nothing-racist-in-their-digs

Here is another argument making same points your making

http://www.waywordradio.org/like-white-on-rice/


In fact if you google raciest comments 'white on rice' you will find many debates on weather the comment is considered reacist.  The fact there are so many debates should tell you something.   At least it does me, it tells me that if there has to be a debate about it that there is always to sides.  One that feels it is and one that feels its not.



Most white men argue the same points you do.  My point is, your points of what you think as a white man about this particular subject are invalid.  Ask nearly any black man if he considers it a raciest comment and he will tell you yes.   End of Conversation.


Gypsy your nothing more then an ankle biting troll.  Please start adding to the conversation instead of trying to escalate anger and negativity in this forum board or move on. 
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: ISS Hawk on September 15, 2013, 06:39:07 AM
@ Matt H

is the criteria for locking threads only when someone says something against BFG?
or maybe you let the people tear each other up and when it all subsides you lock the thread "to keep the discussions civil".
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Grabby Raccoon on September 15, 2013, 06:58:50 AM
As I said we would, we have voted on your war proposal and our unanimous decision has been to reject your proposal for war.

From wikipedia War is described as:
An organised and often prolonged armed conflict that is carried out by states or non-state actors. It is characterised by extreme violence, social disruption, and economic destruction. War should be understood as an actual, intentional and widespread armed conflict between political communities, and therefore is defined as a form of political violence or intervention.

Our reasoning for rejecting your proposal is the simple lack of quarrel with your alliance. We do not require red on our galaxy screens to have fun as we enjoy what we do whether that be utilizing our hephs in search and destroy missions or hunting the ever present npc's.

A proposal such as this would be far more alluring in one of the more richer universes such as Conquest or even nova. Original though the longest lived is also the hardest to rebuild in, and though none of our membership fears the prospect of rebuilding or even the threat that your alliance projects we simply do not see the need to engage you.

Thank you for the offer to engage your finest cadre, we wish you the best of luck in your endeavour to fight a massive war.

Kindest Regards,
Grand Booby Hunter Grabby Raccoon
Leader of Systemic Genesis Alliance (S-Gen)
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 15, 2013, 03:16:18 PM
yay back on topic!
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Armus the Black on September 15, 2013, 07:11:22 PM
I see the ghost of the Emperor still lingers over the universe.
Long past are the times of glory and courage.
The fear from the top 100 alliances stinks like piss.

Yes. You all stink like piss
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: lazoputz on September 15, 2013, 07:44:11 PM
I wondered what that smell was. I thought it was just my sweaty feet from running away from you tough dudes
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 15, 2013, 09:33:06 PM
All I hear is clucking kaork????? You got time to post....no time to play....but call others cowards...when you gonna come out and play...sissy boy??? We are all waiting.....???? Cluck ...cluck....cluck...
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Vastet on September 16, 2013, 01:56:22 AM
This has very little (nothing??) to do with this thread, except it addresses something that Kaork said in one of his previous posts.

Kaork accused laz of making a racist statement for using the expression, "like white on rice".

Nope.  Think about it.  White.  Rice.  Rice is white. The white is really close to the rice.  The main use of the term is this:

   
To be on or close to something.

And, in his context, that is how laz meant to use the term.


Kaork, did you have another usage in mind?

Technically, not all rice is white. ;)
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 16, 2013, 05:37:09 AM
All I hear is clucking kaork????? You got time to post....no time to play....but call others cowards...when you gonna come out and play...sissy boy??? We are all waiting.....???? Cluck ...cluck....cluck...


My 9 year old has a higher IQ then you do
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 16, 2013, 05:40:57 AM
With 5 wars going we are still hoping more to join this glorious event.  Come one come all!

I'll give the 10th alliance whom accepts the war request a moon shot to a lower ranked member of your choice and location.  You get some of my fleet and hopefully a moon.   
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: ISS Hawk on September 16, 2013, 09:03:46 AM
@ Kaork

HEY!! Thats not fair  ;D
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 16, 2013, 12:48:37 PM
Cluck.....cluck.....cluck...I can't hear you over all that clucking.... Oh that's called pushing idiot...you looking to get suspended???  Cluck ....cluck.....cluck.....how much you sell eggs for ??? :o
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 16, 2013, 04:06:13 PM
I'm an idiot?   How would me crashing ships into a lower ranked (smaller) player for a moonshot be pushing.   I think it's you are the idiot you are repeating yourself over and over and over and over and over and over and over. 

How many teeth do you have? you need at least 2 so the rest of us know your IQ level troll.  I will not be responding to you from here out. I have added a script that when you reply in this board I see nothing but brown.  Brown because that is the color of a pile of crap.  Move on troll you are not welcome here unless you are adding the conversation, as opposed to breeding negativity. 

Ps I asked you what alliance your in, you never let me know.   How about a planet location or an In game name?   Who's the chicken here me or you?   Nm your opinion is invalid, as all trolls are


Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Matt H on September 16, 2013, 04:22:31 PM
May not be pushing but sure would violate the DSP rule.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 16, 2013, 05:44:12 PM
Please explain how it be any different then a moonshot?   Is it cause we would be at war.  I'm just trying to offer incentive but if that's the case I will withdraw the statement. 
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Zarchne on September 16, 2013, 05:49:41 PM
Legitimate moonshots are a special exception (and a somewhat controversial one).  From the RULES:

Quote
It is against the rules to devise a scheme to increase a players destroyed ship points score, with the exception of moonshots, outside of the normal course of play. Examples of prohibited actions include crashing ships into a planet with no expectation or belief that they will survive battle or otherwise provide any gain to the attacker, pre-arranging for a player to destroy ships left on a planet, or otherwise providing another player with information that would allow them to destroy ships arriving at a planet.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Matt H on September 16, 2013, 05:49:58 PM
Your primary goal is to provide DSP to another player, not to provide a moonshot. This violates our rules.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 16, 2013, 06:00:07 PM
Your primary goal is to provide DSP to another player, not to provide a moonshot. This violates our rules.


I see, that's a very easy fix. My comment has been edited for your approval.  And thanks for the explanation.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: gypsy88 on September 16, 2013, 06:16:59 PM
Being as how I'm only 5yrs old....I take that as a compliment kaork  :o :o :o
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Unownreality on September 16, 2013, 07:52:01 PM
hahaha!
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Rogan on September 16, 2013, 07:55:06 PM
With 5 wars going we are still hoping more to join this glorious event.  Come one come all!

I'll give the 10th alliance whom accepts the war request a moon shot to a lower ranked member of your choice and location.  You get some of my fleet and hopefully a moon.   

Your primary goal is to provide DSP to another player, not to provide a moonshot. This violates our rules.

I did not see anywhere stated that he was crashing ships into another player for DSP. The offer was specifically geared for a moon shot on a lower ranked player in another alliance. There was also no time limit defined on when a "Moon Shot" would be delivered. It could be offered AFTER the war had been completed, or before, if Kaork thought the offer were genuine. As for someone 'getting some of his fleet' ... anyone who sends fleet at anybody for a moon shot gets some of that persons fleet and the associated DSP, whether it be 10000 hermes or 6000 Artemis. So by your inferred definition, all moon shots are DSP Pushing Rule violations.
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Kaork on September 16, 2013, 08:01:26 PM
Good points rogan but to be clear it did say something about DSP. I have edited it to stay within the rules. 
Title: Re: 2nd SFCO Galactic War
Post by: Matt H on September 16, 2013, 08:04:10 PM
Not that I'm back in the office after being sick last week I've taken the time to review this thread. It clear it veers far off the path of the forum rules. You're welcome to post about wars, but continually belittling each other because you don't agree on how the game should be played, well that's "chicken shit".

This thread is locked. Behave yourselves.