contact
August 22, 2019, 04:37:40 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - poeticmotion

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 128
16
Battle Reports / Re: Graveyard
« on: December 13, 2010, 09:19:41 AM »
It doesn't do you much good to block out the A/W/S info on your ships if you leave it up on your defenses. Fortunately, that kept you from breaking that particular part of the BR posting rules.

And a 3 hour IPM bombardment? You're BOTH doing it wrong. He's using way too many missiles to make a profit on that baby fleet unless you had a lot of res sitting there. You have too many defenses.

17
Off-Topic / Re: A counter
« on: December 13, 2010, 05:34:45 AM »
Quote from: "PseudoFrog"
    312[/list]

    Mon Sep 13, 2010 11:24 pm - OP posted in "Feature Requests"
    Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:33 pm - Post 311, thread moved to "Off Topic"

    It took 300+ posts and a couple of days shy of three months to decide this was off topic?

    This thread started as a feature request (albeit a dumb request, but how many aren't?) and rapidly evolved into a fun feature. Alas, moving it will kill it, I never read this forum.

    Move it back, please

    Frog

    Is this on-topic?

    No.

    View new posts. Use it. Love it.

    18
    General Starfleet Discussion / Re: Petition
    « on: December 13, 2010, 05:30:36 AM »
    Don't get me wrong. I have some major disagreements with the rollout of X-2. I just think receiving chain messages to a half-assed worthless petition is a waste of my time. Let's not compound the waste by having BFG send out messages and announcements. Some people are eagerly looking forward to it. If you want to play, play. If you don't, don't. X-2 will make very little difference in the player base for the existing unis. Face reality, people; there are going to be very few new signups to a uni over a year old (original) and almost a year old (extreme). No one wants to play a game where they have zero chance of ever catching up to the top 5000, much less the top ten.

    19
    General Starfleet Discussion / Re: Petition
    « on: December 13, 2010, 02:44:19 AM »
    And how many of those are valid?

    The problem with this so-called petition is that anyone can sign anything to it. I just read the petition. I notice multiple major issues.

     I notice multiple name repeats of unique names (one example: Fleet Admiral Decker has signed at numbers 102 AND 328.).

     At #314, you have this: "SFC_Santa - you've been very naughty this year, BFG!" which I seriously doubt to be a real name.

    This so-called petition has no validity. Anyone can sign any name. There are multiple names on it of people that I'm fairly confident haven't played the game in months. BFG SHOULD ignore this petition. Phil is claiming to speak for a large percentage of the SFC player base, but the petition he's spammed all over the board and the game has zero validity due to the inability to ensure that all names on the petition are A: Active customers, B: Separate customers and C: Actually signed their own name to it.

    20
    General Starfleet Discussion / Re: SFC Chain Mail
    « on: December 11, 2010, 12:21:40 AM »
    It scares me that Phil can get anyone perma banned.

    21
    General Starfleet Discussion / Re: SFC Chain Mail
    « on: December 10, 2010, 06:16:40 AM »
    The difference is in intent. It was intended to be a chain letter. Therefore, to me, it's spam.

    22
    General Starfleet Discussion / Re: SFC Chain Mail
    « on: December 10, 2010, 06:10:30 AM »
    Quote from: "Sid82"
    Normally, I really don't like phil, and I agree that spamming in game was probably not a good way to go about it...but just because you don't like a person doesn't mean they can't be right sometimes...and I happen to believe that this is one of the few times he is right

    I don't care if he's right. I don't like getting spammed with people's opinions in an internet game. His behavior is immature and detrimental to the game and he should be suspended.

    23
    General Starfleet Discussion / Re: SFC Chain Mail
    « on: December 10, 2010, 04:35:53 AM »
    Quote from: "justacarnie"
    I would agree but in all honesty Phil isn't the only one who thinks X-2 is a bad idea. So why not try to get BFG to listen even though its near impossiable. lol

    I agree that there are things wrong with X-2. They should give it until January, and use the uni2 mining formula, maybe add an addjustment to the DF calc. But chain mail in game? Stupid idea.

    24
    General Starfleet Discussion / Re: Petition
    « on: December 10, 2010, 03:43:12 AM »
    Quote from: "darkset"
    someone get me that chain letter

    Don't even think about it. I WILL STAB YOU.

    25
    General Starfleet Discussion / Re: Petition
    « on: December 10, 2010, 03:20:07 AM »
    Quote from: "Phil Sutherland"
    Can someone start off the chain in Uni 2?

    If I receive a single spam chain letter message in uni2, I am ticketing everyone involved to support and demanding their suspension or I quit. I'm here to play a funing game, not to listen to some gamepolitical ranting from a guy who has proven himself incompetent at life.

    26
    Extreme Universe / Re: Will you play Uni 2 Extreme?
    « on: December 10, 2010, 03:18:25 AM »
    Quote from: "Boris Alden"
    Well excuse me if I swear....

    &uck this.....

    It's gonna be the same what the hell is the point....?

    Shit I can get suspended for 3 days here why do I need a different reality to do the same..

    Load of &uckin' bollocks call me old fashioned even in *inferior game* each Uni is different... is it not....?

    I'll be staying in Xtreme as my main focus......

    In 0game most unis aren't different...they do come out with special unis, but with 40+ unis there's just a lot more special unis. Most of them are just like SFC uni1.

    27
    General Starfleet Discussion / Re: SFC Chain Mail
    « on: December 10, 2010, 03:11:51 AM »
    Quote from: "Phil Sutherland"
    Ive had 41 but since I started it and have one of the biggest buddy lists in the game Im not surprised.

    Wow. And this guy was a moderator?

    Seriously...spamming people with a petition in-game because you don't like something? Why don't you spend your time doing something more constructive like extending your record number of alliances having been kicked from.

    28
    Feature Suggestions / Re: The "Like, OMG!" Class Superdreadnought
    « on: December 09, 2010, 10:52:40 AM »
    Come on, BFG! It's been months!!!!! Why hasn't this been added?

    29
    Battle Reports / Re: Darkset goes boom?
    « on: December 09, 2010, 12:55:51 AM »
    Quote from: "bryn987"
    Whoever said Darkset was the most dangerous player in the game probably meant most dangerous to himself  :lol:  :lol:

    That was me. Anyone can get trapped by a good harvest ninja. I stand by what I said.

    30
    Quote from: "2$Bill"
    Quote from: "Bravicus"
    $2 don't sell yourself short, you could easily be both. lol


    I thought people didn't like me because of my brutal use of the uncomfortable truth that is a Mexican border town, so Hot Air didn't fit into my own self perception.  As well, The inflated ego didn't fit because I don't really care what people think of me.  Because in RL i am a baptist preacher, and this being the internet, I am allowed to be whoever I want reguardless of what people think.

    2$Bill isn't a person. He's the personification of 4chan's bastard stepchild.

    Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 128