Starfleet Commander Forum

Starfleet Commander => Tournament Universe => Topic started by: Bravicus on August 22, 2013, 05:11:13 AM

Title: nothing
Post by: Bravicus on August 22, 2013, 05:11:13 AM
Redacted
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Coolloser on August 23, 2013, 07:07:12 AM
Tease
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Athena on September 10, 2013, 10:04:59 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Phil M on September 11, 2013, 06:07:50 AM
I wanted to read something

thats 15 seconds of my life I'll never get back :(
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Athena on September 11, 2013, 08:25:45 PM
You have written enough nonsense on the forum that others have had to read that this is just karma Phil.

Plus.... The topic name kinda is a clue.  :-*
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: buckweed 1 on September 12, 2013, 01:12:27 PM
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Phil is easily perplexed about nothingness  :P
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Phil M on September 12, 2013, 02:03:34 PM
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Phil is easily perplexed about nothingness  :P

Now I'm just disconbobulated
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: silly_me on September 12, 2013, 03:26:07 PM
there's a lot of nothingness in space... where no one can hear you scream.

Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Zarchne on September 12, 2013, 05:50:40 PM
Nature abhors a vacuum, but as for nurture, well, personally, my mom made me vacuum a lot.
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Vastet on September 12, 2013, 05:56:01 PM
That phrase never made sense to me. The vast majority of nature is a vacuum. Not a perfect vacuum of course, but still.
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Zarchne on September 12, 2013, 06:09:36 PM
According to Tom Batiuk (in a Funky Winkerbean strip), if you take a Hoover and put it out in a field, eventually the effects of weather will cause it to completely disintegrate, proving the statement.  Of course, the real source is probably Aristotle, who made a lot of well-founded statements that turned out not to be the case.  Even Descartes disbelieved in vacuum.  I think it really wasn't until the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887 that the true vacuity of the vacuum was finally demonstrated (positively or negatively, depending on your definition of "vacuity").
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Zarchne on September 12, 2013, 06:27:44 PM
Also, the fact that a thread about nothing can generate over ten replies might say something about the nature of some humans.
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Phil M on September 12, 2013, 10:00:29 PM
Also, the fact that a thread about nothing can generate over ten replies might say something about the nature of some humans.

Just think at the replies a thread called "something" would have gotten
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Zarchne on September 12, 2013, 10:44:51 PM
Maybe fewer.  Unspecified something is not necessarily more interesting than nothing.  (Is what she said.)
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Phil M on September 12, 2013, 11:47:47 PM
I always prefer a little bit of something rather than a lot of nothing
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Zarchne on September 13, 2013, 12:33:44 AM
I always prefer a little bit of something rather than a lot of nothing

I bet you do.  As for myself, I like the nothing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Much_Ado_About_Nothing#Noting) I get.
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Vastet on September 13, 2013, 02:22:14 AM
Ah but can anyone honestly say they can conceive of nothing? In many ways nothing is more interesting than something. ;)
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: Bravicus on September 13, 2013, 04:35:58 AM
best thread evar
Title: Re: nothing
Post by: renykeny on September 13, 2013, 01:15:52 PM
 8)  thanks, but it was nothing!