contact
July 21, 2019, 01:17:56 PM

Author Topic: Scott Antichow vs Tricky Dicky  (Read 999 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Scott Antichow

  • Member
  • Posts: 412
    • View Profile
Scott Antichow vs Tricky Dicky
« on: February 23, 2016, 07:00:47 PM »
Personal Best to date on a live player. I was totally blown away that I was able to get the hit. Tricky Dicky is usually a hard player to catch.


To: Scott Antichow
Date: 2016-02-23 06:21:12 UTC
In the attack from Language of the Mad ‎‎‎[5:249:12m] on Revenge ‎‎‎[5:249:14m]:

The attacking side acquired 2,601,889,582,831,762 ore, 292,658,684,860,338 crystal, and 1,246,983,833,512,877 hydrogen.

Scott Antichow (ATTACKER) lost 174,825,826,179,035 RSP and gained 474,344,148,963,992 DSP. (more)
Tricky Dicky (DEFENDER) lost 474,344,148,964,540 RSP and gained 174,825,826,179,035 DSP. (more)

99,470,957,343,196,192 ore and 76,197,107,901,272,992 crystal are now floating at this location.

See more...

Offline commander abаб

  • Member
  • Posts: 736
    • View Profile
Re: Scott Antichow vs Tricky Dicky
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2016, 12:07:29 AM »
Uhh, where's the ships?

Offline occuli imperator

  • Member
  • Posts: 897
    • View Profile
Re: Scott Antichow vs Tricky Dicky
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2016, 05:41:10 AM »
Scott being in a warring alliance starting Saturday .
that information is classified..
Sorry
My enemy’s enemy is a problem for later: In the meantime, they might be useful.

Offline commander abаб

  • Member
  • Posts: 736
    • View Profile
Re: Scott Antichow vs Tricky Dicky
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2016, 07:14:05 AM »
Well then, don't post it in battle reports

THE SLASH

  • Guest
Re: Scott Antichow vs Tricky Dicky
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2016, 08:26:47 PM »
Well then, don't post it in battle reports

Hey Colonel gadaffi. He does not have to post ships. 

Offline WGW

  • Member
  • Posts: 1050
    • View Profile
Re: Scott Antichow vs Tricky Dicky
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2016, 10:53:43 PM »
actually......

When creating a battle report thread please follow the following formatting.

Please include this at the very top of the post above any discussion that may be included:

Attacker1[Alliance], Attacker2[Alliance] vs. Defender1[Alliance], Defender2[Alliance]... ect.

When posting a Battle Report, you must include:
The ingame names of all attackers and defenders.
Combat techs must either be given for both attackers and defenders or none at all [Only possible with converted battle reports].
The complete individual fleets of all attackers and defenders both before and after the battle [Final State] must be shown.
The resources captured and the debris field generated even if all are zero.
For both battles with more than 1 wave, the follow up waves can be shortened to just the resources captured and the debris field created.

“And he who wields white, wild magic gold is a paradox. For he is everything and nothing. Hero and fool. Potent, helpless. And with one word of truth or treachery, He will save or damn the earth. Because he is mad and sane. Cold and passionate, Lost and found”

THE SLASH

  • Guest
Re: Scott Antichow vs Tricky Dicky
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2016, 11:52:22 PM »
YES THAT WAS 6 YEARS AGO AND THEN ALSORTS OF FORUM RULES GOT RELAXED AND YOU WAS EVEN ALLOWED TO START POSTING COORDS   :o

Offline Stina Starr

  • Member
  • Posts: 583
    • Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/hodgsonsurvivor
    • View Profile
Re: Scott Antichow vs Tricky Dicky
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2016, 12:28:33 AM »
Battle reports posted to this thread should include full reports. Otherwise, post it later when it doesn't compromise security or not at all.

 

birthmark-ant