contact
November 17, 2018, 07:34:23 PM

Author Topic: SFC Chain Mail  (Read 2007 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Satok

  • Member
  • Posts: 974
    • View Profile
Re: SFC Chain Mail
« Reply #45 on: December 10, 2010, 09:27:11 PM »
Quote from: "Phil Sutherland"
Well I think that may have been the only one. Not bad for 2000 signatures.

I agree and I signed it, and it seems the community is in agreement about this. My only concern is how seriously they will take this. Most organizations do not take online petitions seriously because they cannot certify the signatures.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 12:00:00 AM by Guest »
Satok de\'Tampa

Offline Phil Sutherland

  • Member
  • Posts: 1196
    • View Profile
    • http://www.example.com/
Re: SFC Chain Mail
« Reply #46 on: December 10, 2010, 09:29:20 PM »
Almost all of the signatures came from different Ip addresses except a few. creating 2000 Ip addresses is not easy.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 12:00:00 AM by Guest »
[/b] [/b][/b] [/b] [size=150]#26

Offline Satok

  • Member
  • Posts: 974
    • View Profile
Re: SFC Chain Mail
« Reply #47 on: December 10, 2010, 09:30:56 PM »
Quote from: "Phil Sutherland"
Almost all of the signatures came from different Ip addresses except a few. creating 2000 Ip addresses is not easy.

Agreed, but it still does not certify that those IPs belong to actual players. I am just explaining why "most" organizations will not take online petitions seriously. Maybe BFG will, but I am not holding my breath. Maybe we are spinning our wheels because they already plan to change something but are not specifying yet.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 12:00:00 AM by Guest »
Satok de\'Tampa

Offline Phil Sutherland

  • Member
  • Posts: 1196
    • View Profile
    • http://www.example.com/
Re: SFC Chain Mail
« Reply #48 on: December 10, 2010, 09:35:58 PM »
Well there were alot of comments regarding payment that might catch their eye.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 12:00:00 AM by Guest »
[/b] [/b][/b] [/b] [size=150]#26

Offline Phil Sutherland

  • Member
  • Posts: 1196
    • View Profile
    • http://www.example.com/
Re: SFC Chain Mail
« Reply #49 on: December 10, 2010, 09:51:25 PM »
IP address 216.130.88.170 posted the message about Jason. He has now been perm banned.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 12:00:00 AM by Guest »
[/b] [/b][/b] [/b] [size=150]#26

Offline poeticmotion

  • Member
  • Posts: 1914
    • View Profile
Re: SFC Chain Mail
« Reply #50 on: December 11, 2010, 12:21:40 AM »
It scares me that Phil can get anyone perma banned.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 12:00:00 AM by Guest »
Uni2-PoeticMotion[ODB] Peak rank 24 peak DSP rank 9 ***RETIRED FROM SFC***


Offline Aaria.moon

  • Member
  • Posts: 2463
    • View Profile
Re: SFC Chain Mail
« Reply #51 on: December 11, 2010, 12:25:39 AM »
Quote from: "Phil Sutherland"
IP address 216.130.88.170 posted the message about Jason. He has now been perm banned.

Thats my IP!!!!!
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 12:00:00 AM by Guest »
HONEYBEE MALES: DURING COPULATION THEIR BODY EXPLODES APART LIKE GRENADE; GENITALIA HAS HOOKS AND SPINES AND IT WEDGES INTO FEMALE AND SEALS HER OPENING.

Offline Phil Sutherland

  • Member
  • Posts: 1196
    • View Profile
    • http://www.example.com/
Re: SFC Chain Mail
« Reply #52 on: December 11, 2010, 03:24:45 PM »
Quote from: "Aaria.moon"
Quote from: "Phil Sutherland"
IP address 216.130.88.170 posted the message about Jason. He has now been perm banned.

Thats my IP!!!!!
lol
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 12:00:00 AM by Guest »
[/b] [/b][/b] [/b] [size=150]#26