contact
August 23, 2019, 05:59:18 AM

Author Topic: disgusting sat basher attackes  (Read 2898 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline r miller

  • Member
  • Posts: 95
    • View Profile
disgusting sat basher attackes
« on: September 03, 2014, 10:29:12 PM »
im gonna post that battle report on forums, u sleazy mudfeeder. and post fact i informed you 20 minutes out i was online.

u will pay for letting that attack run, kinda fun to have an actual enemy now :)

will post battle report next,he got squat, cept a few helios. would have got less, but i got a business call, and booked a $10k job. I thought that was more important than a few res here

Offline r miller

  • Member
  • Posts: 95
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2014, 10:30:10 PM »
In the attack from yep ‎‎[1:67:8] on K5 ‎‎[1:66:6]:

The attacking side acquired 6,178 hydrogen.
The attacking side did not acquire any Eradeon.

low (ATTACKER) lost 0 RSP and gained 54 DSP. (less)

  * Contributed 2,059 RSP to the battle.

  * Lost 0 ore, 0 crystal, and 0 hydrogen in damages.

  * Acquired 0 ore, 0 crystal, and 6,178 hydrogen in plunder.


  * Lost 0 of 71 Poseidon Class Cruisers (71 remain).
       


rob miller (DEFENDER) lost 54 RSP and gained 0 DSP. (less)

  * Contributed 54 RSP to the battle.

  * Lost 0 ore, 54,000 crystal, and 13,500 hydrogen in damages.


  * Lost 27 of 27 Helios Class Solar Satellites (0 remain).
       



0 ore and 16,200 crystal are now floating at this location.

Offline Zarchne

  • Member
  • Posts: 1611
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2014, 10:33:52 PM »
You're building Helios at this stage of this universe?  And, I expect, not defending them with Plasma?

... Oh, what, not any defense?  Uh...

Offline Zarchne

  • Member
  • Posts: 1611
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2014, 11:54:10 PM »
You would hardly expect any serious gamer to care about 27 sats. I don't think it even unlocks a quest until there are 100 there.

So why is he complaining?  Oh, you mean the attacker.

I find it hilarious how you always get some idiot in a new uni thinking killing sats in the early game is a good source of dsp. 54 dsp for over 1hr 30. Mins of time? Personally, I don't even bother making a hit in a new uni until the debris clouds start touching 1mil.

So why'd you quit?

Waste of time up until that point because scraping bones. What these fools don't understand is that 1 hit of a normalish fleet is equivalent to hundreds of petty sat hits. How many hours of life is that wasted?

Nah, some people (who aren't me) really really like making hits.  That's what they live for.  You just have to prepare for it or roll with it.

Offline commander abаб

  • Member
  • Posts: 738
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2014, 02:24:18 AM »
That's a good bit of hydro to be gained in Eradeon.  He wasn't after your helios, he was after the hydro.

Offline stevie ray vaughn

  • Member
  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2014, 03:04:35 AM »
In the attack from yep ‎‎[1:67:8] on K5 ‎‎[1:66:6]:

The attacking side acquired 6,178 hydrogen.
The attacking side did not acquire any Eradeon.

low (ATTACKER) lost 0 RSP and gained 54 DSP. (less)

  * Contributed 2,059 RSP to the battle.

  * Lost 0 ore, 0 crystal, and 0 hydrogen in damages.

  * Acquired 0 ore, 0 crystal, and 6,178 hydrogen in plunder.


  * Lost 0 of 71 Poseidon Class Cruisers (71 remain).
       


rob miller (DEFENDER) lost 54 RSP and gained 0 DSP. (less)

  * Contributed 54 RSP to the battle.

  * Lost 0 ore, 54,000 crystal, and 13,500 hydrogen in damages.


  * Lost 27 of 27 Helios Class Solar Satellites (0 remain).
       



0 ore and 16,200 crystal are now floating at this location.


Free res in this uni is good, and along with that 6k hydro, he got another 16k crystal also Iif he went for the df

you should probably have some defences up to make them not worth hitting

Offline Audacious

  • Member
  • Posts: 406
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2014, 03:12:03 AM »
That's a good bit of hydro to be gained in Eradeon.  He wasn't after your helios, he was after the hydro.

You must have very poor hydro mines if you think that's good hydro, that's like 20 minutes production for me.

Anyways he might have just gone afk. Happened to me I launched an attack and I meant to come back 5 minutes before it landed but I got distracted. I got back on at the same time the attack landed. Didn't feel good about it but was unintentional.

Offline Zarchne

  • Member
  • Posts: 1611
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2014, 03:56:38 AM »
Anyways he might have just gone afk.

Yeah, I've had ninjas that shouldn't have worked but the attacker later admitted he got distracted.  (Admittedly, these were on follow-up raids after losing the moon's utility fleet.  Hurray for moon defense!)

Offline stevie ray vaughn

  • Member
  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2014, 07:20:12 AM »
You must have very poor hydro mines if you think that's good hydro, that's like 20 minutes production for me.

not everyone has mine production like you, I only produce 1.5k per hour since I've had to spend all my res on gias trying to get a planet worth keeping, and there are some people who dont build up mines and get their res from attacking people. Not everybody plays like you

Offline commander abаб

  • Member
  • Posts: 738
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2014, 07:52:55 AM »
Also, look at it this way:  sometimes there is a daily quest for destroying x/x helios satellites in battle; reward is half a token and a nice amount of resources.  :)

Offline stevie ray vaughn

  • Member
  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #10 on: September 04, 2014, 11:31:11 AM »
That's you, my luck is a little differen, and haven't gotten much over 200 fields, and I'm not going to waste time building up bad planets

Offline Phil M

  • Member
  • Posts: 1216
    • Facebook - phil.mcbride.3
    • Skype - thesevenlevels
    • Twitter - philipmcbride
    • View Profile
    • Phil Mc Bride
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #11 on: September 04, 2014, 03:47:37 PM »
WHY EDIT THE BR ? FULL BR TELLS A STORY, EDITING MAKES YOU LOOK LIKE YOU ARE HIDING SOMETHING!


Here's an idea for all of you to remember

QUESTS

I would have let the attack run as well and I don't bash sats!

in a uni where the res is difficult to come by and your income streams are:

i - tokens
ii - mines
iii - raids on other players
iv - DF's
v - QUESTS

you get free res for completing quests, some of these quests require that you take out any planet defenses and these are daily quests which means, if your def is weak its going to get crashed no matter what is on planet, if your def is strong you will get crashed in GA's

learn to think before posting

GOONS!
« Last Edit: September 04, 2014, 03:55:53 PM by Phil M »
The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis.

Offline commander abаб

  • Member
  • Posts: 738
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #12 on: September 04, 2014, 07:18:37 PM »
It's something to think about before you build 10000 missile batteries.

Offline Audacious

  • Member
  • Posts: 406
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #13 on: September 05, 2014, 02:19:43 AM »
It's something to think about before you build 10000 missile batteries.

Well there are quests for building defenses too.  :P

Offline Zarchne

  • Member
  • Posts: 1611
    • View Profile
Re: disgusting sat basher attackes
« Reply #14 on: September 05, 2014, 07:09:44 AM »
It finally occurred to me why the OP thought he could get away with building Helios and no defense: you can do that if (a) people don't attack you when you are on and (b) you use p-mode when you're not on.  He was mad mainly because (a) failed to be true.