contact
October 22, 2019, 03:41:22 AM

Author Topic: lame gameplay  (Read 2700 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Speedy

  • Member
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
lame gameplay
« on: May 20, 2015, 07:17:15 PM »
nice to see that players who rank in the top-10 only attack players ranked at least 250 ranks below them.. how fkin lame..  and you think you're so damn good.

but you guys dont have the balls to attack someone on your own level, cos -omg- it might cost you a couple ships... something you can easily avoid by attacking players who rank 250 spots lower than yourself, and with total overkill... so you're 200% sure you gonna win the battle...

really lame and takes the fun away for lotsa people.

and yeah, before u guys start bitching that its a wargame and i shouldnt complain.. whatever.. you still suck, period.

(talking about the eradeon2 uni)
Who\'s General Failure, and why is he reading my disk?

Offline Bodge

  • Member
  • Posts: 1248
    • View Profile
    • Bodgenet
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2015, 08:05:27 PM »
 ;D 8) :P :-X :-* :-\ ;D :D ;D

I attack everyone, regardless of rank!!!!
 

Offline censored

  • Member
  • Posts: 1194
  • censored
    • Facebook - censored
    • LinkedIn - censored
    • Skype - censored
    • Twitter - censored
    • View Profile
    • censored
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2015, 10:02:19 PM »
lol me too. It's not that hard to not get blown up. I'll never understand why some people think they should be immune to attack from people just because of rank. I have had a lot of fun with people ranked MUCH higher than me. I won't go into detail, but I recently caused a lot of headaches for someone in a uni, Someone who has 44,000 times as much fleet as I do. If you play smart, rank doesn't matter.
Butthurt losers completely owned by me:

Matt H
Grace
Swanvesta
Tech9
BrianC

Offline gohabsgo

  • Member
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2015, 11:02:22 PM »
Just fleetsave.

Sent from my Passport using Tapatalk


Offline commander abаб

  • Member
  • Posts: 738
    • View Profile
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2015, 03:22:33 AM »
nice to see that players who rank in the top-10 only attack players ranked at least 250 ranks below them.. how fkin lame..  and you think you're so damn good.

but you guys dont have the balls to attack someone on your own level, cos -omg- it might cost you a couple ships... something you can easily avoid by attacking players who rank 250 spots lower than yourself, and with total overkill... so you're 200% sure you gonna win the battle...

really lame and takes the fun away for lotsa people.

and yeah, before u guys start bitching that its a wargame and i shouldnt complain.. whatever.. you still suck, period.

(talking about the eradeon2 uni)

Nuke them :)

Offline censored

  • Member
  • Posts: 1194
  • censored
    • Facebook - censored
    • LinkedIn - censored
    • Skype - censored
    • Twitter - censored
    • View Profile
    • censored
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2015, 04:00:34 AM »
Everyone in the top 10 uses p. Nuking isn't really a viable option unless you're at least in the top 50 and can overwhelm the abms in a single launch.
There also aren't a lot of people in the top 10 who have enough defences to be worth nuking.
Butthurt losers completely owned by me:

Matt H
Grace
Swanvesta
Tech9
BrianC

Offline Dupres

  • Member
  • Posts: 52
  • Mumintrollet säger Muuuu...
    • Twitter - @joyrider19
    • View Profile
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2015, 12:51:20 PM »
Anything that aint green and makes a profit i hit..and theres one green i want to hit..but still n:-(((
Cherries kicking the balls....

Offline Speedy

  • Member
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2015, 07:27:11 PM »
yeah, but when they attack you with a ship ratio of 20 to 1... pff

and indeed, most top-10 players are in p, but that doesnt change anything, they drop out of p, do a bunch of attacks and quickly go back to p.. talking about lame. so why dont they fkin fleetsave?

but anyways, my time will come.. some day ;-)
Who\'s General Failure, and why is he reading my disk?

Offline The Real Highlander

  • Member
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2015, 11:00:59 PM »
Speedy can you say open mouth insert foot.  You just showed everyone that you do not understand the concept of these games. When you can, you send extra ships to make your loses less. Also some people do it to lesson the chance of them being surprised by a ninja. Do you know what a ninja is? It is not one of those guys in the robes with a sword.

Offline Phil M

  • Member
  • Posts: 1216
    • Facebook - phil.mcbride.3
    • Skype - thesevenlevels
    • Twitter - philipmcbride
    • View Profile
    • Phil Mc Bride
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #9 on: May 24, 2015, 10:33:26 AM »
i think:

trick no 1 would be dont leave your ships down when your offline (assuming a successful attack)
trick no 2 would be to message and say - im online, generally they will recall
trick no 3 would be plan a ninja (not the robed sworded ones as above)
trick no 4 might be to join a decent alliance

my rule of thumb is only to attack players in the top 100, never outwith no matter my rank. Bodge above is a more realistic version of the game player base. If you have ships down players will go for them as the little * means squat, return fleet, other probe, nuke (do nukes still show as *?).

Be aware, learn and yes, your time will come!

Also, learn to post in the right sub section!
The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis.

Offline censored

  • Member
  • Posts: 1194
  • censored
    • Facebook - censored
    • LinkedIn - censored
    • Skype - censored
    • Twitter - censored
    • View Profile
    • censored
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #10 on: May 24, 2015, 11:57:15 AM »
No, nukes don't activate a *.
Butthurt losers completely owned by me:

Matt H
Grace
Swanvesta
Tech9
BrianC

Offline DolphinDiver

  • Member
  • Posts: 338
    • View Profile
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2015, 07:08:09 PM »
Agree to most instead of:

trick no 2 would be to message and say - im online, generally they will recall


Its much more funny to send them home with

0 ships destroyed
0 resources plundered

You should learn to treat such kind of battle reports as "win". You will recognize that your fun about it will increase with each time you do so :) especially when you receive tons of hate mails of attackers blaming you for it. I loved this move soooo much :)

Offline censored

  • Member
  • Posts: 1194
  • censored
    • Facebook - censored
    • LinkedIn - censored
    • Skype - censored
    • Twitter - censored
    • View Profile
    • censored
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #12 on: June 02, 2015, 07:14:35 PM »
You'll get a swarm of nukes from me, not hate mail. It's people like you that have made me decide to start nuking people before my fleet even gets there.
Butthurt losers completely owned by me:

Matt H
Grace
Swanvesta
Tech9
BrianC

Offline DolphinDiver

  • Member
  • Posts: 338
    • View Profile
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #13 on: June 02, 2015, 07:21:43 PM »
I would not even care one second about your nukes cause they wont find anything to destroy  ;D Players like me do not build defenses because we want players like you to come here  8)

There are hundreds of players who call their nukes when it happens to them. This is what makes the move so funny and efficient. Because players like you hate it so much because there is nothing else you can do except of watching your fleet flying home with empty tanks and lots of laughters behind  ;D

Offline censored

  • Member
  • Posts: 1194
  • censored
    • Facebook - censored
    • LinkedIn - censored
    • Skype - censored
    • Twitter - censored
    • View Profile
    • censored
Re: lame gameplay
« Reply #14 on: June 02, 2015, 07:26:49 PM »
Then I get to farm you instead. Either way, people who choose to be sleazy pay for it. 8)
Butthurt losers completely owned by me:

Matt H
Grace
Swanvesta
Tech9
BrianC

 

birthmark-ant